EverBright, solar financing platform

Behind the pitch

How solar reps actually sell, and where the platform got in their way

My role

UX Researcher (ran all field sessions)

Timeline

Feb to Aug 2024

Team

Co-led with lead designer Tracey Morris

Skills

Contextual inquiry, synthesis, product thinking

3 orgs

3 orgs

3 orgs

Shadowed sales reps in the field across Texas and California, as well as sales manager and internal stakeholder interviews.

14 insights

14 insights

14 insights

Synthesized in Dovetail, each paired with an opportunity statement that fed the sales-platform roadmap.

2 yr roadmap

2 yr roadmap

2 yr roadmap

Our journey map, personas, and insights became the baseline for a multi-year sales-platform roadmap and several shipped initiatives.

Why it matters

The most common way to buy solar scores near the bottom on satisfaction

More than half of homeowners go solar through a door-to-door rep, and that channel scores near the bottom on satisfaction (an NPS of 8 versus 33 for homeowners who do their own research). Reps sit at the center of a 25-year decision, yet no one at EverBright had actually watched how they sell at the kitchen table, meaning that product decisions were riding on assumptions.

How homeowners buy, and how they feel after - NPS survey, N=1,965

Door-to-door

Buyers

51%

NPS

8

Referred by a friend

Buyers

18%

NPS

27

Did their own research

Buyers

10%

NPS

33

The channel most homeowners use is the one that satisfies them least.

Role & research question

What I owned, and what we asked

I ran all of the field research; every ride-along and shadowing session with the sales orgs. Synthesis, the artifacts, and the final readout were co-led with lead designer Tracey Morris. Alongside the fieldwork, we also interviewed internal stakeholders across tech, sales, ops, CX, and marketing.

Research question

How do sales reps actually move a homeowner from a knock to a signature, and where does our platform help or get in the way?

Approach

Watching the work—not just asking about it

The core method used was contextual inquiry: 3-4 hour ride-alongs where I rode with reps as they canvassed and pitched, so I could see behavior instead of relying on what people say they do. We paired that with foundational interviews, an internal sales-team round-table, stakeholder interviews, and existing NPS data.

Methods

  • Ride-alongs with reps in the field

  • 12 rep and manager interviews

  • 5 stakeholder interviews

  • Internal sales round-table

  • NPS analysis

Participants

  • Sales reps and management across 3 sales orgs

  • Internal and third party teams

  • Texas and California

Constraints we named

  • Unable to sit in on closing appointments

  • Only 3 orgs, across 2 states

  • A baseline for ongoing research rather than a final answer

research process

Process

1

Planned the study around assumptions and gaps

We started from the leadership and product teams' assumptions and named the knowledge gaps the research needed to close via the fieldwork. Objective: understand how and why reps use the platform end to end, to inform the roadmap and the address-to-contract redesign.

2

Rode along in the field

Across three orgs, I shadowed setters and closers through canvassing, pitching, and design. Watching in context surfaced the workarounds and unspoken strategies that interviews alone would have missed, like reps quietly bending usage numbers to make a savings story land. It also became crystal clear that EverBright is one node in a wider tool ecosystem, rather than the whole workflow.

3

Synthesized 14 insights in Dovetail

We coded field notes and interviews, clustered them into themes, and landed 14 insights across the setting and closing stages of the journey. Those distilled into seven how-might-we opportunities, allowing our findings to point directly at design decisions.

The 14 insights, in brief

1. Target low-income neighborhoods for PPA sales

2. Use all canvassing tools at their disposal

3. Present offering as alternative to utility company

4. Setters need to collect utility information

5. Efficiently obtain prequalification status

6. Closer continues narrative of providing salvation from utility

7. Closers set up an interactive environment with homeowners

8. Sales reps manipulate usage data to project savings

9. Closers limit options they share with homeowners

10. Proposal does not facilitate sales rep’s showmanship

11. Contract does not encourage homeowner confidence

12. Homeowners seek reputable brands that they trust

13. EPC adjustments constitute our biggest pain point with sales reps

14. Sales reps fulfill a valuable role as the point of contact for homeowners

4

Built the artifacts: a journey map and two personas

The kitchen table sale runs on a setter-closer model, so we mapped the journey across Setting and Closing with goals, actions, emotions, and pain points, and created two more refined personas for the Setter and the Closer, to make the split legible for product teams.

The Setter

Junior, in training. Knocks, qualifies, and collects info. No platform access.

The Closer

Experienced, paid based on closes. Builds trust, often skips the proposal, and controls information to hold leverage.

5

Turned insights into opportunities

The 14 insights ran the length of the journey, from neighborhood selection to the years after signing. We distilled them into seven opportunities for the platform teams. The one that impacted my work directly: reps bend usage data to sell a better savings story, which became the guardrails question and, later, the Usage Phase rebuild.

How might we…

01 …adapt our offerings with the understanding that sales reps are targeting low-income households?

02 …enhance the canvassing experience, leveraging information we already have access to?

03 …incentivize more ethical and transparent sales?

04 …provide closers with tools that facilitate the showmanship aspect of their job?

05 …provide sales reps with the freedom that keeps them engaged with our product, while also enforcing necessary guardrails?

This one became the Usage Phase rebuild

06 …increase trust in EverBright as a financier?

07 …connect homeowners with the appropriate party to address their needs throughout the lifespan of their contract?

Impact

What the research moved

This was the first foundational look at how EverBright’s product is actually used in the field. The journey map, personas, and insights became a shared baseline that design strategy carried to executive leadership to shape a two-to-three year sales-platform roadmap. Several shipped initiatives trace back to it.

Insight → Usage Phase guardrails

The usage-data insight became the guardrail strategy in my own project, which helped bring utility-bill rejections down from 55% to 34%.

Insight → Partner team’s proposal redesign

The finding that reps sell by conversation and leave the proposal unused fed the homeowner proposal redesign: proposal views before signing rose to 87%, completed reviews by 918%.

learnings

Reflection

Research access is a relationship you maintain, not a resource you can assume

A second round of research launched in 2025 with a new PM, and I shaped the research plan and discussion guides, as well as supported the PM-led interviews with sales org managers. One of our key aims in the second round was to observe closing appointments, but we were unable to land a single one; after a year of platform changes, few partners were still actively engaged and goodwill had thinned. We closed the study in July 2025 with the plan documented for the future.

I’m Arielle, a product designer based in Austin, Texas.

© Arielle Schoen 2026

I’m Arielle, a product designer based in Austin, Texas.

© Arielle Schoen 2026

I’m Arielle, a product designer based in Austin, Texas.

© Arielle Schoen 2026